Orign of 'Snakes & Ladders'

A True Open Forum; Share/Discuss whatever you like
User avatar
Masato
Site Admin
Posts: 18304
Joined: Mon Jun 25, 2012 3:16 pm
Reputation: 8227

Orign of 'Snakes & Ladders'

Postby Masato » Fri Feb 26, 2016 4:38 pm

Snakes and Ladders (often known as Chutes and Ladders in the United States) was originally developed in India around the 2nd century BC.

It was an educational game, used to teach the virtues of the Jainist and Hindu faiths.

The ladders represented the virtues that would help you attain nirvana, and the snakes represented vices that would set you back. The game was played with dice, and the player was also supposed to reflect on how they didn't have control over how the pieces moved, which symbolized destiny.

In Jainist philosophy, the most notable thing is complete non-violence. Killing any living thing is forbidden, and considered to impede the way to nirvana. Self-control and asceticism are also important parts of the religion, and it shares many common themes with Buddhism.

For Aristotle the goal of life was to become a ideal person, and similar in some ways to India philosophies, the "good life" and the virtuous life coincided. However, for Aristotle, virtues were mostly understood to a mean between two extremes, both of which strayed from what it meant to be an excellent human being. For example, "courage" is certainly a virtue, but it isn't just being able to face your fear - it is also being able to know when to fear. A man who had no fear at all would also fail to be an excellent human being, because they would take unnecessary risks. So courage isn't simply a positive virtue where the more you have the better, if you have too much you are "foolhardy", which is also bad. Coming to a balance between extremes allows a person to act justly, wisely and effectively.

For Dostoyevsky, the idea that a single certain path could take humanity to happiness was a contradiction. In Notes From The Underground he attacks the ideas of people like Aristotle, as well as modernist utilitarian thinkers, who believed that we could come to a final conclusion about what would render mankind happy, and if we did, then everyone would follow that path towards their own happiness. Dostoyevsky says that there is one virtue that is above all others: the freedom to do as you please. He claims that even if we were to somehow figure out the exact way to make everyone as happy as possible, humanity would revolt against it just to exert their own freedom. In this sense, it is impossible for humans to be totally happy. This doesn't, however, mean that Dostoyevsky was some kind of moral relativist, believing that any life was just as good as any other. He certainly believed that we could make bad decisions about the kind of life to lead, and favored a certain kind of religious life above others. He just thought that a single, final solution was contradictory, because no one would do it if it was set in stone, with no room for freedom.



Now, with that in mind.... enjoy this clever comic:

Image
Image
Image

User avatar
Masato
Site Admin
Posts: 18304
Joined: Mon Jun 25, 2012 3:16 pm
Reputation: 8227

Postby Masato » Fri Feb 26, 2016 4:41 pm

And with THAT in mind, enjoy this cool video:


Snakes and Ladders - How the Meaning of an Ancient Children's Game Adapted Over Time





User avatar
Masato
Site Admin
Posts: 18304
Joined: Mon Jun 25, 2012 3:16 pm
Reputation: 8227

Postby Masato » Fri Feb 26, 2016 4:42 pm

Is life just an elaborate game of Snakes & Ladders?

User avatar
Canuckster
Posts: 6731
Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2012 5:24 pm
Reputation: 3073

Postby Canuckster » Fri Feb 26, 2016 7:21 pm

Top notch post, I really enjoyed that.
People say they all want the truth, but when they are confronted with a truth that disagrees with them, they balk at it as if it were an unwanted zombie apocalypse come to destroy civilization.


Return to “Anarchy Zone”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 145 guests