Hitler discovers that Chuck Norris is coming:

Politics, History, & 'Conspiracy'
User avatar
Masato
Site Admin
Posts: 18299
Joined: Mon Jun 25, 2012 3:16 pm
Reputation: 8227

Hitler discovers that Chuck Norris is coming:

Postby Masato » Thu Jun 26, 2014 2:19 pm

Edge Guerrero wrote:- Hitler was a scumbag, there are other scumbags bad like him.
Same to Osama.


^ scumbags can be very useful to bigger scumbags :)

User avatar
Luigi
Posts: 4234
Joined: Fri Oct 11, 2013 11:01 pm
Reputation: 2931

Postby Luigi » Thu Jun 26, 2014 3:05 pm

Those are some interesting perspectives, just wondering how you figure 9/11 fits into all of that? What possible desired outcome could result from it?
Image

User avatar
Masato
Site Admin
Posts: 18299
Joined: Mon Jun 25, 2012 3:16 pm
Reputation: 8227

Postby Masato » Thu Jun 26, 2014 11:10 pm

^ well for one, continued/increased presence in the Middle East!

WWII managed to get a foothold in (Israel) - a STRONG foothold. Now they needed to bring in the rest of the troops...! 911 worked like a fuckin charm.

Purposes of 911;

- To get troops into Middle East/world sympathy for invasion/hatred and fear of arabs
- Destabilize the region/Topple all leaders resistant to Western Banking System
- Have a reason to continue pumping money into the Defence Budget/Military technology
- As the US Borrows more $$ for War, the stranglehold of Central Banks rises/the more the people are enslaved to 'debt' (this is the source of their power)
- Increase security/policing/surveillance within the US
- Launder $2.3 TRILLION that was announced 'missing' on Sept 10, and divert the media from EVER investigating/reporting on this
- Have a reason to beef up the UN/NATO, or international cooperation facing a 'mutual threat'
- Steal GOLD deposits at the base of the twin towers

- ...and then the obvious smaller benefits: Massive Insider Trading, Middle East Oil, Afghan Heroin, Huge Weapons Contracts (Cheney-Halliburton), etc

In order to have War, there needs to be an enemy. The pattern is to make ABSTRACT and face-less 'enemies', so they can perpetuate war as long as possible. - The Cold War was over, they had already invaded/changed most of the communist countries they could, and the great 'Red Scare' was over. (watch the shift in the coming years from terrorism to environmentalism... presented 'solutions' will be global in nature)

The only major areas of the world left militarily resisting the 'NWO' was the arab countries. THEY know the true face of Western Zionist Imperialism, and were/are fighting it vigorously. This area needed to be destroyed/re-managed. So they a perfect new 'threat' to keep the machine rolling; 'The War on TERROR'.

It was either gonna be a flase flag in Israel, or a false flag at home. Either way they were invading the Middle East. 911 was just the show to get all the people to support it/shut up the critics.

THEY WANT THAT 'HOLY LAND'!

User avatar
Masato
Site Admin
Posts: 18299
Joined: Mon Jun 25, 2012 3:16 pm
Reputation: 8227

Postby Masato » Thu Jun 26, 2014 11:11 pm





User avatar
Luigi
Posts: 4234
Joined: Fri Oct 11, 2013 11:01 pm
Reputation: 2931

Postby Luigi » Fri Jun 27, 2014 1:56 am

But how would invading Afghanistan give them power in the Middle East or the Arab world? Afghanistan is borderline outside the Middle East and is far from any Arab nation. I dont think they have much oil either. If they had invaded Saudi Arabia and set up a puppet government who loved secularism and low oil prices I could see it. It seems like at the end of the day they just wasted a ton of their money so that Bush could police the world how he saw fit (just like his daddy).

What makes it seem even stranger is that the US is now supporting Jihadist revolutionaries in their efforts to oust pro-West secularist dictators (Mubarak and Assaad).

I can see the argument for increased domestic security though, its no secret that the war on terror allows authorities to violate rights when there is a perceived threat.
Image

User avatar
Masato
Site Admin
Posts: 18299
Joined: Mon Jun 25, 2012 3:16 pm
Reputation: 8227

Postby Masato » Fri Jun 27, 2014 9:28 am

Afghanistan is perfect location, it borders on Iran, and offers a direct route for oil pipelines (that began construction BEFORE 911) from the Caspian Sea to the Arabian Sea for export. As SOON as they got to afghanistan, work on the pipeline kicked into high gear.

The other perhaps smaller reason for control of Afghanistan is to control the HEROIN industry. There is ample proof and even admissions that the US Military are defending/controlling the poppy fields. It is a HUGE industry.

Image

Look at this map: Iran is the last country to be assimilated - they now have it almost completely surrounded. *yellow stars are US MILITARY BASES
(note this map os OLD, as SYRIA has now also been invaded/destabilized)
Image

Crimea is also conveniently situated in a way that could finally secure the last strip of land where Iran could connect to its last real ally, Russia. If the US gets control of land between the Black Sea and Caspian Sea, Iran is fucked. Putin is painted as a bad guy but he is the among the last of the world's nations to stand up to the NWO.

User avatar
Masato
Site Admin
Posts: 18299
Joined: Mon Jun 25, 2012 3:16 pm
Reputation: 8227

Postby Masato » Fri Jun 27, 2014 9:33 am

You can't just look presidency to presidency... you have to look at the LONG TERM goals.

The idea of a 1-world government with its seat in Israel (rebuilding of Solomon's Temple) is a LONG, OLD, concept. These are fervent and radical religious fanatics, and they have been working very hard to achieve it by any means possible. (I am not talking about Judaism... this is a LUCIFERIAN religion)

Understanding this goal brings almost everything in the geo-political world for the past 100 years (or more) into clarity.

User avatar
Luigi
Posts: 4234
Joined: Fri Oct 11, 2013 11:01 pm
Reputation: 2931

Postby Luigi » Fri Jun 27, 2014 10:17 am

Thats some interesting stuff. So what exactly is Americas involvement in the heroine industry?
Image

User avatar
Masato
Site Admin
Posts: 18299
Joined: Mon Jun 25, 2012 3:16 pm
Reputation: 8227

Postby Masato » Fri Jun 27, 2014 10:29 am

What do you mean when you say 'America'?

IMO these kinds of nationalistic words have been twisted to fuck us up. It is so often spoken as if the government and the people are 1 thing; each represents the other. I think this couldn't be further from the truth; YOU and I are not 'in Iraq'... it is a small handful of obscenely powerful people who are conceiving and doing these things for their own reasons, and they don't give a fuck about YOU and I, as long as we stay out of their way. It is a rogue force, the true nature of the world has always been anarchy imo
(Just like YOU and I are not 'in the World Cup' lol. Sports reinforces this association with ones' government, and thus all their policies/actions as well)

The other fuckover is treating a nation or government as if it is some sovereign and independent entity. Again, couldn't be further from the truth. Not only are western governments basically so embedded at the corporate level they have essentially become corporations of themselves... but all these corporations are unanimously owned/controlled by the main central banking system that funds them all/holds them in debt... and the same central banks that make all US-directed Military Action possible.

The only REAL nation states are the ones that got invaded, lol (or are on a short hit-list)


as to your question (sorry)..:)

- HEROIN is one of the most profitable industries on the planet, and a direct contact to the underworld. Controlling this would be smart for many reasons, profits alone just being one.

Another, is that if you can control WHERE the heroin goes... you have the power to destabilize/fuck up geographical areas. If you bring huge shipments to a certain area, it immediately creates problems/violence in the area. It also gives you an excuse to invade/police places, because they have the drugs you gave 'em, lol - Reversely, if you want another area to do well/prosper, you can limit the inflow of heroin and keep the population more clean.

lol, watch how befuddled these guys in the studio are at this story - it completely fucks up their programming :)






The CIA has been involved in drugs for DECADES. Research Bush Sr and Clintons' actions in Central/South America with Heroin, it is ridiculous.





User avatar
Masato
Site Admin
Posts: 18299
Joined: Mon Jun 25, 2012 3:16 pm
Reputation: 8227

Postby Masato » Fri Jun 27, 2014 10:42 am

Of course Wikipedia is not a valid source, but it does offer a great synopsis of some search terms to begin some better research on the better-known examples:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Allegation ... rafficking

The War on Drugs is simply a War on 'Competition'.

Just as other drug traffickers or any other big business competes with each other, it is all about limiting underground power from drug-profits, and cornering the market. It is absurd imo to believe that the US is so trustworthy as to really destroy all the drugs they find and not be tempted to benefit from taking over the industry.

As J D Rockefeller so prophetically said, "Competition is a sin'.


Return to “The Grand Chessboard”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 96 guests