PedoGate
-
Diet Butcher
- Posts: 1647
- Joined: Fri Nov 07, 2014 9:31 am
- Reputation: 2093
Congratulations! You have found the Masato Toys Forum!
Where Creative, Freethinking, & Insightful Humans (and non-humans) are always welcome.
Share, Learn, Create, Inspire: Click HERE to Join
Where Creative, Freethinking, & Insightful Humans (and non-humans) are always welcome.
Share, Learn, Create, Inspire: Click HERE to Join
So this SOUND OF FREEDOM movie is out.
I have not watched, I am well aware of the reality of child trafficking and feel no need to re-traumatize myself over it
However I am interested in the controversy of how it being perceived.
MSM shits on it, suggesting maybe it is doing some damage, but on the other hand it apparently is a complete Limited Hangout and doesn't point any fingers on any known sources of modern child traffickers.
Now it has come out it was funded by someone involved with the Clintons and Podestas.
This video highlights this, along with the history of the Clintons and the Podestas being at the FOREFRONT of organizations supposedly in charge of 'missing and exploited children'.
The theory is that they literally control the opposition, to make it look like something is done about it, while at the exact same time they run all the intelligence on missing kids to their advantage.
Something off about this film. Brings Mel Gibson into question too as he apparently endorsed this.
Why has Gibson never really called anyone out?
The whole thing is weird. I have been waiting for a big whistleblow on this issue for many years, this film does not resonate like that imo at all.
How is it being played in theatres???
Smells like controlled opposition/Limited Hangout operation. But let's keep looking and listening.
Help me dig this one, folks
I have not watched, I am well aware of the reality of child trafficking and feel no need to re-traumatize myself over it
However I am interested in the controversy of how it being perceived.
MSM shits on it, suggesting maybe it is doing some damage, but on the other hand it apparently is a complete Limited Hangout and doesn't point any fingers on any known sources of modern child traffickers.
Now it has come out it was funded by someone involved with the Clintons and Podestas.
This video highlights this, along with the history of the Clintons and the Podestas being at the FOREFRONT of organizations supposedly in charge of 'missing and exploited children'.
The theory is that they literally control the opposition, to make it look like something is done about it, while at the exact same time they run all the intelligence on missing kids to their advantage.
Something off about this film. Brings Mel Gibson into question too as he apparently endorsed this.
Why has Gibson never really called anyone out?
The whole thing is weird. I have been waiting for a big whistleblow on this issue for many years, this film does not resonate like that imo at all.
How is it being played in theatres???
Smells like controlled opposition/Limited Hangout operation. But let's keep looking and listening.
Help me dig this one, folks
Owen Benjamin went hard against it. Apparently Caviezel watched child porn to prep for the role.
Som-Pong wrote:Owen Benjamin went hard against it. Apparently Caviezel watched child porn to prep for the role.
