The 9/11 Investigations

Politics, History, & 'Conspiracy'
User avatar
Posts: 5954
Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2012 5:24 pm
Reputation: 2881

Re: The 9/11 Investigations

Postby Canuckster » Thu Mar 30, 2017 12:57 am

this is as good a place as any for this

People say they all want the truth, but when they are confronted with a truth that disagrees with them, they balk at it as if it were an unwanted zombie apocalypse come to destroy civilization.

User avatar
Site Admin
Posts: 14513
Joined: Mon Jun 25, 2012 3:16 pm
Reputation: 6747

Postby Masato » Fri Jun 30, 2017 8:25 pm

Here is a list of reasons someone has made suggesting that 9/11 was not an inside job, but a Mossad operation with the assistance of a few key inside figures:

• The five notorious “dancing Israelis” who filmed the Twin Towers’ destruction, after which they celebrated, high-fiving each other and even photographing themselves flicking a lighter against the backdrop of the smoking ruins. They were arrested after driving off in a van whose license number was reported by a neighbor. Later it was revealed that at least two of them were agents of Mossad, Israel’s intelligence service.

• Michael Chertoff was put in charge of the Justice Department’s investigation of 9/11, despite his mother having been a Mossad agent, and Chertoff himself reportedly holding dual citizenship in Israel. Chertoff released hundreds of arrested Israelis back to Israel, including the notorious “dancing Israelis.”

• Quoting Wikispooks: “The company that ran airport security at all three airports where the alleged hijackings originated was Huntsleigh USA, a wholly owned subsidiary of ICTS International and owned by Ezra Harel and Menachem Atzmon —both Israeli Jews.”

• ”Lucky Larry” Silverstein, who became the new owner of the World Trade Center less than two months before the attacks, and earned an insurance payout of nearly $5 billion on his $124 million investment (after missing the disaster due to a fortuitous doctor’s appointment on the morning of 9/11) was such good friends with Benjamin Netanyahu that the Israeli newspaper Haaretz reported in November 2001: “Every Sunday afternoon, New York time, Netanyahu would call Silverstein. It made no difference what the subject was or where Netanyahu was, he would always call.”1

• Supported by funds from Israel’s government, Zim Israel Navigational was the world’s ninth largest shipping firm. It had its American headquarters in the World Trade Center—until about two weeks before 9/11. Zim then moved its offices and employees to a new building, claiming rent was cheaper there.

• The 9/11 Commission’s executive director was Philip Zelikow, a dual U.S.-Israeli citizen. Why should anyone with sworn loyalty to a foreign nation be entrusted with such a position?

• On 9/11, the chairman of George W. Bush’s Defense Policy Board was Richard Perle, whom the National Security Agency had caught spying on the U.S. for Israel in 1970.

• On 9/11, employees of the Israeli instant messaging company Odigo received messages two hours before the attack, warning them not to be in the World Trade Center.

• Ptech, a software firm linked to Israeli intelligence, had provided vital software being used by the FAA, FBI, and U.S. armed forces on 9/11.

• On 9/11, seated in row 9 of Flight 11 (directly behind “Mohammed Atta”) was Danny Lewin, a former captain in the IDF (Israeli Defense Force), and who served in the Sayeret Matkal, which specializes in counter-terrorism, hostage rescue, and assassination. Lewin could bench-press 315 pounds and “was trained to kill terrorists with a pen or a credit card, or just his bare hands.”2 In 2000, he had himself photographed in front of panels resembling the Twin Towers, wearing a Swatch Watch whose model name was “Hijacker.” The hour, minute and second hands were all on the “11” and the date was set to the 11th, even though the picture was taken on the 10th.

^^ that list does not include the Israeli 'Art Students' and their activities in the WTC

Nor the monopoly of airport security that was owned by an Ireali company connected to DOV ZAKHEIM (if you are not familiar with Dov Zakheim do a search in this forum or look further online, I believe him to be a key player 9/11)

User avatar
Site Admin
Posts: 14513
Joined: Mon Jun 25, 2012 3:16 pm
Reputation: 6747

Postby Masato » Fri Jun 30, 2017 8:31 pm

Here is Netanyahu, 2 DAYS AFTER 9/11, not only calling for total war against Iran and Iraq, but also somehow knowing the specifics of what destroyed the towers.

He denied that they were nuclear bombs, and stated specifically that the towers were destroyed by a '150 lb conventional bomb'.

a) I thought the story was that there were no bombs, and that planes/jet fuel caused the destruction?
b) how would he even be so confident either way, only 2 days after the event?

User avatar
Site Admin
Posts: 14513
Joined: Mon Jun 25, 2012 3:16 pm
Reputation: 6747

Postby Masato » Fri Jun 30, 2017 8:34 pm

Mulitple Eyewitness Testimonies of SHANKSVILLE from first-on-the-scene, all stating there was NO EVIDENCE OF A PLANE.

"Nothing you could distinguish that a plane had crashed there."

Its so crazy, there they are, looking at this whole in the ground but NO PLANES... yet they have been told this is a plane crash site by their bosses so they are all perplexed, not even trusting their eyes:

User avatar
Site Admin
Posts: 14513
Joined: Mon Jun 25, 2012 3:16 pm
Reputation: 6747

Postby Masato » Sun Jul 23, 2017 3:25 pm

Hey all, this is some big news imo

This Ryan Dawson guy, who is some kind of savant at remembering conspiracy details, has just released a new film regarding 9/11

IMO, Ryan Dawson is a weirdo but is a solid researcher. He stays away from silly things, and lasers-in on provable facts etc and has put together a puzzle of immense detail. Not saying he's right about it all but as a researcher he's one that has impressed me, he's made some great docs.

Anyways he has a new one coming out. Here is a free 40-minute excerpt from it, he wants you to buy the full version. I know, I know, but the dude wants to make more movies and needs to eat and get his haircuts lol. No seriously I think it will be very good, its $20 I might get a copy tbh

The vid suggests that there were huge leads pointing to MOSSAD involvement with 9/11, and that they were all quickly covered up, shredded and ignored by the MSM. Dawson however seems to have collected a great deal of transcripts and data and is putting together the pieces. Dawson says most 'conspiracy' groups and personalities like Alex Jones for instance will talk all day about every other lead, but NO ONE touches this angle, which Dawson says actually makes the most sense over all of them.

Here is a trailer:

Here is a free lengthy excerpt. I've watched it he presents solid evidence I honestly haven't seen barely from anywhere else

Here is the link where you can get the full version if anyone is interested:

I'm sure a free one will be available soon but I kinda dig this guy, he wants to make more films and is a pretty amazing researcher. Hope he does well and isn't suicided

User avatar
Posts: 1598
Joined: Sat Jun 07, 2014 2:25 pm
Reputation: 2966

Postby Daglord » Thu Aug 24, 2017 6:15 pm


The 9/11 cover up is not a “conspiracy theory”


Once you understand that 9/11 “controlled demolition” theories and “No plane hit the Pentagon” You Tube enabled speculation are both wrong and a distraction from the official 9/11 cover up:

you will find a rich source of evidence in the declassified official 9/11 investigation documents. Just ask the classic investigative questions: Who knew what, when and who was to blame for allowing 9/11 to happen? Blame also includes criminal negligence and malfeasance in a public office. Lets be 100% clear about this: 9/11 could have been prevented by something as simple as one person in a department of 50 people in the CIA (Alec Station) just picking up a telephone and telling the FBI that two known Al Qaeda terrorists (Al-Mihdhar and Al-Hamzi) had entered the US with intentions to carry out a terrorist attack. These two terrorists would have been found rapidly by the FBI and the 9/11 plot would have been stopped. The paper trail of declassified CIA cables show almost all of Alec Station knew the two terrorists had entered America. They deliberately stopped that information from reaching the FBI for a period of over 18 months:

Former FBI Agent Mark Rossini Driven to Expose CIA’s 9/11 Secret

The CIA then lied about their criminal with-holding of information to the 9/11 investigations. Watch George Tenet lie to the US Congress in this video when he says, “I know that nobody read that cable”:


Chapter 15 - nobody read the cable

The published final reports and declassified documents from the 9/11 Joint Inquiry, the 9/11 Commission and the various specific agency OIG reports allow the determined, independent researcher to focus on the key aspects of the 9/11 “intelligence failures”, which are so far unexplained and covered up:

1) Why did the CIA with-hold knowledge of 9/11 hijackers AlHamzi and AlMhidhar’s presence in the United States from the FBI for over a year? Why did the CIA cover up their surveillance and protection of Al-Hamzi and Al-Mhidar, when they were living inside America? Why did the CIA criminally obstruct the FBI’s investigation into Al Qaeda’s attack on the USS Cole in Yemen?

Did the C.I.A. stop an F.B.I. detective from preventing 9/11?

Did the CIA with-hold information from the FBI about the 9/11 hijackers in order to stop those inside CIA Alec Station from going to jail for criminally obstructing the FBI’s investigation into the USS Cole attack — which would have exposed CIA knowledge of the Al Qaeda 9/11 planning meeting in Malaysia between 5–8th January 2000? If the CIA had told the FBI about AlHamzi and AlMhidhar’s presence in the US, the 9/11 plot would have been stopped. This is the opinion of Richard Clarke, Ali Soufan, Mark Rossini, Lawrence Wright and many others:

Apportioning blame and criminal accountability was avoided by the 9/11 Commission: it was “a failure of imagination” in the US intelligence community that allowed 9/11 to happen. The final report did not blame 9/11 on any one agency or individual. Blame and accountability was supposed to be dealt with by the Office of Inspector General’s reports. When the 9/11 CIA OIG report was finally published it recommended accountability boards for George Tenet, Cofer Black, Richard Blee, Tom Wilshire and others in CIA, to answer for their actions. The CIA and the President chose to completely ignore this recommendation by the CIA’s own Inspector General.

CIA agents won't be punished for 9/11 errors

The CIA OIG report is up on the CIA website for all to read here:

CIA Releases Declassified Documents Related to 9/11 Attacks

Instead of accountability boards recommended by the Inspector General John Helgerson, those in CIA responsible for allowing 9/11 to happen were promoted or given lucrative contracts in private security companies. This is prima facie evidence of a 9/11 cover up. For example in January 2000 Alfreda Francies Bikowsky stopped an FBI agent inside CIA Alec Station (called Doug Miller) from sending a cable warning the FBI that Al-Mihdar had a visa to enter the US. Instead of being fired Alfreda was given cover status after 9/11 and was a key player in the illegal CIA torture program and Iraq WMD lies

Meet Alfreda Bikowsky, the Senior Officer at the Center of the CIA’s Torture Scandals

Alfreda allowed 9/11 to happen but she was promoted and not fired. When Cofer Black left the CIA he became a millionaire as a senior executive at Blackwater, the private military contractor. The people responsible for allowing 9/11 to happen were rewarded and not punished. Think about that for a minute. How can the mainstream media and academics in America and Britain deny the fact that there was a 9/11 cover up? See more evidence here:

2) Why was the Saudi support network inside the US for 9/11 covered up in the redacted 28 pages of the 9/11 Joint Inquiry?

The Twenty-Eight Pages

Why did the CIA rely on the Saudi state intelligence agency (the GID) for their surveillance of known Al Qaeda operatives in the US, when many in the Saudi royal family were actively funding and supporting Osama Bin Laden’s plan to attack America? Evidence suggests there was a failed attempt by CIA Alec Station to recruit Al-Mihdar and Al-Hazmi as double agents inside Al Qaeda:

and that this failed operation was covered up by the 9/11 Commission, to save the CIA from embarrassment and the wrath of the American people. See more evidence here:

3) How did the NSA get away without any blame or censure from the 9/11 Commission for their malfeasance and accountablity for 9/11? For example the NSA knew Al-Mhidar was calling the Al Qaeda communication hub from San Diago, USA but lied about this to the 9/11 investigations:

The Al Qaeda Switchboard

NSA then used their lies about not knowing the calls they intercepted to the Yemen hub had originated in San Diago, to justify their post 9/11 dragnet surviellance of Americans and the wider world in collaboration with GCHQ

James Bamford: “Is the NSA lying about its failure to prevent 9/11?

As we know from Edward Snowden’s leaks, the National Security Agency is the largest and most powerful intelligence agency in America and the world. Why did’nt the 9/11 Commission investigate the NSA when it attempted to understand the 9/11 “intelligence failures”?

9/11 Mystery: NSA Files on Al Qaeda Attack Never Probed

This omission by the 9/11 Commission looks like a deliberate cover up, once we know that NSA knew that Al-Mihdar was calling the Al Qaeda Yemen switchboard from San Diego. Evidence from ex-NSA officer Thomas Drake, who was part of the official Congressional investigations into 9/11, also suggests the NSA had enough information to know about the 9/11 attack before it happened and to stop it, as a stand alone agency, i.e. without the need to share information with any other US intelligence agency, which is the usual excuse given in the official story for why 9/11 happened.

Declassify Thomas Drake’s suppressed 9/11 testimony

User avatar
Site Admin
Posts: 14513
Joined: Mon Jun 25, 2012 3:16 pm
Reputation: 6747

Postby Masato » Thu Aug 24, 2017 9:14 pm

Wow, Daglord kicking ass as usual!! ^^

Here is an interesting vid, a summit of 9/11 Truth leaders is coming together, Sibel Edmonds, James Corbett, + more

Looks like some time in September.

Good to see people are still pressing, its so absurd 16 years later we are still running on a narrative that was spewed on DAY 1 by 9/11 suspects and a guy in a Harley Davidson shirt. The whole War On Terror continues on its heels, and the MSM has NEVER looked back.

I still think 9/11 is totally relevant and could bring down a lot of shit if we could just get past the MSM filter

User avatar
Posts: 1598
Joined: Sat Jun 07, 2014 2:25 pm
Reputation: 2966

Postby Daglord » Fri Aug 25, 2017 4:55 pm

someone recently asked "who was Timothy McVeigh"? while digging back through OKC, I found some interesting connections to 9/11 (which I hadn't heard before). a former Senate intelligence committee member (Boren), once considered a mentor to then CIA director George Tenet, inviting a high-ranking CIA officer (Edger) to leave his post in Germany & become a visiting scholar at the University of Oklahoma in Norman? almost immediately before the attacks? the very same place where flight training was taking place? the very same place Moussaoui's ticket was purchased (U of OK library)? the very same people who fingered Bin Laden almost immediately & proceeded to sell the "war on terror"?

Aug 2001 - just before the Sept. 11 attacks, David Edger joins the University of OK @ Norman as a visiting scholar:


David Edger, a high-ranking CIA officer who was previously station chief in Berlin, Germany (see May 1997), joins the political science department of the University of Oklahoma at Norman as a visiting scholar.

Edger’s appointment may have been connected to his previous duties in Germany, where, during the years 1997-2001, he directed CIA surveillance and infiltration attempts against the Hamburg cell of 9/11 hijackers. A 2002 article in a local newspaper makes clear that Edger, or possibly other intelligence officers, had some inside but incomplete foreknowledge of al-Qaeda’s plans: “Up until his appointment with OU six months ago, Edger’s work with the CIA focused on terrorist groups in Germany. One of the three cells he was tracking included some of the people responsible for the Sept. 11 attacks on the World Trade Center. He said although officers knew members of the cell and some of what they were doing, they had no idea that they would meet in London and go to different parts of the US, where they would learn to fly planes to crash into the World Trade Center. ‘In that case, we failed,’ Edger said.”

Edger was invited to U of OK by David Boren, former Democratic senator who headed the Senate’s intelligence committee & acted as mentor to CIA Director George Tenet, who was a Senate staffer before joining the CIA. Boren is also a member of Skull & Bones.


An announcement says that the appointment was arranged by the university’s president David Boren: “David Edger has joined us as a CIA officer in residence. Mr. Edger most recently was stationed at the US Embassy in Berlin as minister-counselor for coordination, where he directed both military and civilian US intelligence programs in Germany. During the two-year assignment, Mr. Edger will teach courses related to the US intelligence community and foreign policy. President David Boren arranged for his participation at OU.”

if you recall, Boren was @ breakfast with Tenet the morning of 9/11 & was said to have immediately wondered if the attacks had "something to do with this guy taking pilot training" at Airman Flight School (in Norman, OK).

According to the Pulitzer Prize-winning author Bob Woodward, in his book “Bush At War,” the two tucked into breakfast at the St. Regis Hotel, three blocks away from the White House. They were longtime friends since Boren’s days as chairman of the Senate Intelligence Committee.

“What is it?” Tenet asked the security guards who’d just run to their table.

“The World Trade tower has been attacked,” said one.

After confirming the attack with CIA headquarters via cell phone, Tenet left Boren.

“I wonder,” Tenet said, “if it has anything to do with this guy taking pilot training.

Airman Flight School, where accused terrorist Zacarias Moussaoui trained for three months before the Sept. 11 attacks, had subleased a building and space from the University of Oklahoma at OU's Max Westheimer Airport. they shut their doors on Sept. 1st, 2004, somewhat abruptly after students had already enrolled for that coming year. of course, this could be due to bad publicity because a fucking 9/11 terrorist took flight training there...

Norman aviation school folds wings at OU airport


I have NO IDEA how this ties into everything, but find it very interesting that Nick Berg, the American beheaded in Iraq by Zarqawi, was also in Norman @ the U of OK at the time. during his very brief time there (one class?), Berg (supposedly) allowed a stranger sitting next to him on the bus, an associate of 9/11 hijacker Moussaoui, to use his computer & email. Moussaoui's Sept. 11th ticket was also said to have been purchased from an OU library from an "white, american male" with a shaved head.


now, with that said, this all could be nothing but an amazing coincidence... but what do you think the odds are of that very same guy, from that (supposedly) "chance encounter" on the bus (Berg), who's email & info were used by Moussaoui's associate, being captured & beheaded later across the globe in Iraq? very slim IMHO.

On May 14, 2004, it was revealed that Nick Berg had been investigated during the U.S. government's investigation of Zacarias Moussaoui. Berg's email address had been used by Moussaoui prior to the September 11, 2001, attacks. According to Berg's father, Nick Berg had a chance encounter with an acquaintance of Moussaoui on a bus in Norman, Oklahoma. This person had asked to borrow Berg's laptop computer to send an email. Berg gave the details of his own email account and password, which were later used by Moussaoui. The FBI found that Berg had no direct terrorism connections or direct link with Moussaoui.

remember - Berg's capture, detainment & beheading was quite the conspiracy in and of itself...

"He said, 'They arrested me because I had a Jewish last name and an Israeli stamp in my passport.' Then the Iraqi police put him with the US military because they thought he was a spy. Nick told me all this. He wasn't mad. It was just an adventure for him. He said, 'This shit happens. It was bad luck'."


The Unanswered Questions of Nick Berg's Murder

Michael Berg, Nicholas's father, insists that for eleven days Nicholas was detained by U.S. forces in Iraq, and the reason Berg lost his life "was the fact that the U.S. government saw fit to keep him in custody for 13 days without any of his due process or civil rights."

According to Berg's friend, Chilean journalist Hugo Infante, Berg told Infante that "Iraqi police caught [him] one night, they saw [his] passport and [his] Jewish last name and [his] Israeli stamp. This guy thought [he] was a spy so they put [him] with American soldiers and American soldiers put [him] in a jail for two weeks."

U.S. officials deny that Berg was ever held in custody by U.S. forces. However, a U.S. general says that FBI agents were the ones who instructed the Iraq police to detain Berg for two weeks, since he was traveling In Iraq without proper documentation. According to the official story, local police in Mosul arrested Berg on March 24 and released him on April 6, during which period the FBI visited the detainee three times.

Mosul police chief Maj. Gen. Mohammed Khair al-Barhawi denies that Berg was ever in Iraqi custody, saying that "The Iraqi police never arrested the slain American…. Take it from me… that such reports are baseless."

Even if the Iraqi police chief is inaccurate in denying Nick was ever in Iraqi custody, Nick’s family remains unconvinced that U.S. officials were not ultimately responsible. Nick’s father said to the Associated Press: "The Iraqi police do not tell the FBI what to do, the FBI tells the Iraqi police what to do. Who do they think they’re kidding?" Nick’s brother, David, points out, "The jail had U.S. MP's in it. Technically it was an Iraqi prison, but there is no Iraqi government, so what does that mean?" Given the recent claim from a U.S. general that the FBI instructed the Iraqi police to hold Nick Berg, his family’s attitude on this makes a lot of sense.

As evidence that Nick was in fact in U.S. custody, his family has provided an e-mail sent on April 1 from U.S. consular officer in Iraq, Beth A. Payne, which says plainly:

"I have confirmed that your son, Nick, is being detained by the U.S. military in Mosul. He is safe. He was picked up approximately one week ago. We will try to obtain additional information regarding his detention and a contact person you can communicate with directly."

Spokeswoman Kelly Shannon has responded that Payne was wrong about this, saying that "as Mr. Berg had been released, the consular officer did not convey this information to the family because he was released, thankfully…. And we thought he was on his way."

From a Strange Encounter With Iraqi Police to Fatal Capture

Mr. Berg was detained in March by the Iraqi police in the northern city of Mosul, American officials and his parents said. While he was in police custody, he was questioned by F.B.I. agents who were trying to determine what he was doing in Iraq and whether he was a United States citizen.

At the same time, his parents, frustrated by their inability to find out about their son's whereabouts, filed a lawsuit in federal court in Philadelphia on April 5 asserting that he was being held by the American military in violation of his civil rights. A day later, he was released.

He disappeared soon after that.

this is basically just throwing shit at the wall, but I can't shake the feeling that these connections seem way too coincidental.


User avatar
Posts: 2376
Joined: Tue Dec 03, 2013 7:57 am
Reputation: 1283

Postby Winnson » Tue Aug 29, 2017 7:03 pm

9/11, Sandy Hook, JFK, whatever.

No one is ever going to know what really happened. All we can do it pontificate these days.

That sucks, but it is what it is. Those pages of history have been permanently re-written.

User avatar
Posts: 1598
Joined: Sat Jun 07, 2014 2:25 pm
Reputation: 2966

Postby Daglord » Fri Sep 01, 2017 6:50 pm

sounds like they will be introducing the "Bobby McIlvaine World Trade Center Investigation Act" at the forum you posted above on Sept. 11th. I (somehow) had never heard of him before. can't really see it going anywhere, but glad they are still trying.

8/31/17: Announcing the Bobby McIlvaine World Trade Center Investigation Act:

In this special episode of 9/11 Free Fall, Bob McIlvaine, Richard Gage, AIA, and Ted Walter discuss the Bobby McIlvaine World Trade Center Investigation Act, which McIlvaine and Gage will officially announce in a news conference at the National Press Club on September 11th. Host Andy Steele's three guests tell how AE911Truth will be calling upon its supporters in the coming months to ask their US representatives to introduce the Act to either chamber of Congress. In addition, Ted Walter and Richard Gage announce Professor Leroy Hulsey's upcoming progress report presentation on his World Trade Center 7 Study, which will be livestreamed from the University of Alaska Fairbanks' website on September 6th.


Bobby McIlvaine World Trade Center Investigation Act


Washington, D.C. – On the 16th anniversary of the September 11th attacks, 9/11 family member Bob McIlvaine and architect Richard Gage, AIA, will announce the Bobby McIlvaine World Trade Center Investigation Act at a news conference to be held at the National Press Club at 1 p.m. EDT.

The Bobby McIlvaine Act is draft legislation that would empanel a select committee in either chamber of Congress to reinvestigate the destruction of the three World Trade Center towers on September 11, 2001. The act is named after Mr. McIlvaine’s son Bobby, who was tragically killed at the age of 26 while entering the North Tower of the World Trade Center.

Mr. McIlvaine has been an outspoken leader in advocating for a new investigation since the release of the 9/11 Commission Report in 2004. Mr. Gage, meanwhile, has worked diligently to educate and mobilize technical professionals since he founded the organization Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth (AE911Truth) in 2006. Today, AE911Truth represents close to 3,000 architects and engineers, as well as two-dozen 9/11 family members, who have signed AE911Truth’s petition calling on Congress to open a new investigation.

Mr. McIlvaine and Mr. Gage will be joined by Peter Michael Ketcham, a former employee of the U.S. Commerce Department’s National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), the agency that was charged with investigating the World Trade Center disaster. Mr. Ketcham first spoke out against his former agency’s investigation in 2016 and has since joined with AE911Truth in championing a new investigation.

At the conclusion of the news conference, Mr. McIlvaine, Mr. Gage, Mr. Ketcham, and supporters of the Bobby McIlvaine Act will proceed to the Capitol, where they will distribute packets to every member of Congress over the next day and a half. They will then work to assemble a bi-partisan group of sponsors and have the resolution introduced by next year’s September 11th anniversary.

The group will use the soon-to-be-released computer simulation of World Trade Center Building 7’s collapse — a study conducted by researchers at the University of Alaska Fairbanks and funded by AE911Truth — to bolster its case that NIST’s account of the building collapses is false and that it is incumbent upon Congress to launch its own investigation.

Bob McIlvaine, a former history teacher from Oreland, PA, is one of the most outspoken 9/11 family members. His son, Robert McIlvaine, Jr. (Princeton University '97) was Assistant Vice-President of Media Relations for Merrill Lynch & Co. and perished at the World Trade Center's North Tower on September 11, 2001. From the evidence that Bob has gathered, it is apparent his son was killed by an explosion, likely in the lobby. Bob is one of the family members who attended every 9/11 Commission hearing as well as numerous 9/11 Truth conferences around the world. He has appeared in several TV, radio and newspaper interviews, as well as the documentary 9/11: Press For Truth, and commercial TV spots on behalf of, calling attention to the mysterious collapse of a third WTC tower which was not hit by an airplane.

Bob McIlvaine on how his son’s death points to controlled demolition

Bob McIlvaine and his family are not alone in having suffered a devastating personal loss on September 11, 2001. The loved ones of the nearly 3,000 victims of the destruction at the World Trade Center know what he has endured for the past 15 years.

But McIlvaine is different from most of these families in important ways. In addition to his unwavering and often lonely fight to expose the complicity of the U.S. government in this false flag attack, he has strong forensic evidence that his 26-year-old son, Bobby, was killed by a powerful explosion as he was about to enter the lobby of the North Tower. That evidence is corroborated by the accounts of many FDNY members, police officers, and workers who reported explosions in the lower parts of the towers before the buildings were destroyed—some of them even before the first airplane struck.

In a recent interview, McIlvaine said his son’s body was one of the first to be recovered and taken to the New York City morgue on that day. He explained that he has been able to reach more definitive conclusions about the details of his son’s death only since conferring with the doctor who had examined his body at the morgue.

The meeting, which McIlvaine recalls happening in 2006 or 2007, provided evidence that a huge explosion — and not the North Tower’s eventual demise — was responsible for killing his son. According to McIlvaine, the wounds described by the doctor indicated that his son had been hit by flying glass from some kind of massive blast. Bobby’s face was damaged beyond recognition, he had lacerations all over his chest from flying glass, and he had post-mortem burns. In fact, the blast was strong enough to literally blow Bobby out of his laced shoes (they were not on the body when it was brought to the morgue).

Return to “The Grand Chessboard”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 7 guests