Thoughts on coronavirus...

Politics, History, & 'Conspiracy'
User avatar
Masato
Site Admin
Posts: 18299
Joined: Mon Jun 25, 2012 3:16 pm
Reputation: 8227

Re: Thoughts on coronavirus...

Postby Masato » Wed Aug 05, 2020 2:07 pm

Canuckster wrote:
Canuckster wrote:https://www.weforum.org/covid-action-platform

"But the sum of many individual actions will not add up to a sufficient response. Only coordinated action by business, combined with global, multistakeholder cooperation – at exceptional scale and speed – can potentially mitigate the risk and impact of this unprecedented crisis"



This website deserves to be investigated. its utterly terrifying, It's a massive, massive trove of societal engineering articles.

"Great Reset: Why LGBT+ inclusion is the secret to cities' post-pandemic success"
https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2020/06/ ... -recovery/

How the media and entertainment industry is addressing systemic racism
https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2020/07/ ... ic-racism/


There's a heatwave at the Arctic ‘doomsday vault’
https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2020/07/ ... te-change/


'We ignore the power of symbols at our peril' - architect David Adjaye on why racist monuments must be replaced
https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2020/07/ ... lace-them/


Football commentary has a racial bias problem, a new study says
https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2020/07/ ... ommentary/

Global Health Security: Epidemics Readiness Accelerator
https://www.weforum.org/projects/managi ... -epidemics


'Phygital': a banking strategy for the new isolation economy
https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2020/06/ ... n-economy/

Image

shaping, shaping, shaping, shaping, shaping............................



^^ that to me is more proof that the whole George Floyd and recent Black Lives Matter media hype is NOT a separate issue from what's going on with covid. They are craftily intertwined, it is a multi-fronted attack on social physchology and culture, we are being manipulated from different angles at once, but they are synchronized. Racial tension and divide is a tool to scramble us and lead us into the corrals.

User avatar
Masato
Site Admin
Posts: 18299
Joined: Mon Jun 25, 2012 3:16 pm
Reputation: 8227

Postby Masato » Wed Aug 05, 2020 2:09 pm

Mirroring Canuckster's post of how widespread and complete this agenda is, here is an outline straight from the UN website regarding their Agenda 2030 plan.

Agenda 2030 is NOT a fictitious concoction of tinfoil hat wearers... it is a FACT and it right out in the open to read.

Just like that website Canuckster posted, look how completely they aim to transform EVERY SINGLE ASPECT OF HUMAN CULTURE into their plan:

Image

To any naive young leftist, every one of those squares will look wonderful and tasty and they will go and help fight for all of them.

To the more informed individual, every one of those squares in the hands of groups like those pushing these agendas will look terrifying and distopian.

This is the schism of our times right now. People either see wtf is happening and will fear it, or they have been tricked to cheer for it all and are walking right into a trap. Our only hope is that the awake are not likely to go back to sleep, but the sleeping still have potential to awake. I don't have any idea what the %'s are.

User avatar
Masato
Site Admin
Posts: 18299
Joined: Mon Jun 25, 2012 3:16 pm
Reputation: 8227

Postby Masato » Thu Aug 06, 2020 1:41 pm

:shock: :shock: :shock:


User avatar
Canuckster
Posts: 6731
Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2012 5:24 pm
Reputation: 3073

Postby Canuckster » Thu Aug 06, 2020 3:54 pm

Just a couple weeks of quarantine they said
People say they all want the truth, but when they are confronted with a truth that disagrees with them, they balk at it as if it were an unwanted zombie apocalypse come to destroy civilization.

User avatar
Rambo John J
Posts: 218
Joined: Thu May 03, 2018 11:39 pm
Reputation: 133

Postby Rambo John J » Thu Aug 06, 2020 3:55 pm

Masato wrote::shock: :shock: :shock:


Somebody should shut off the water to LA
They don't have nearly enough water to support that population

Let it turn back into desert

Fuck that mayor and their governor...Corrupt motherfuckas

User avatar
Rambo John J
Posts: 218
Joined: Thu May 03, 2018 11:39 pm
Reputation: 133

Postby Rambo John J » Thu Aug 06, 2020 3:55 pm

Canuckster wrote:Just a couple weeks of quarantine they said

we just need to flatten the curve bro

User avatar
penxv
Posts: 2303
Joined: Tue Apr 08, 2014 12:49 pm
Reputation: 1150

Postby penxv » Thu Aug 06, 2020 6:55 pm

Rambo John J wrote:
Masato wrote::shock: :shock: :shock:


Somebody should shut off the water to LA
They don't have nearly enough water to support that population

Let it turn back into desert

Fuck that mayor and their governor...Corrupt motherfuckas


I feel like if terrorism was a real thing then the Las Vegas water supply would be the most obvious choice in terms of maximizing damage with limited firepower on a soft target. Place is a uninhabitable shithole just waiting to happen.

User avatar
Megaterio Llamas
Posts: 4008
Joined: Fri Dec 12, 2014 7:56 pm
Reputation: 2533

Postby Megaterio Llamas » Fri Aug 07, 2020 7:27 am

penxv wrote:
Rambo John J wrote:
Masato wrote::shock: :shock: :shock:


Somebody should shut off the water to LA
They don't have nearly enough water to support that population

Let it turn back into desert

Fuck that mayor and their governor...Corrupt motherfuckas


I feel like if terrorism was a real thing then the Las Vegas water supply would be the most obvious choice in terms of maximizing damage with limited firepower on a soft target. Place is a uninhabitable shithole just waiting to happen.

I know. There's no reason why it should be larger than, say, Elko or Wells.
el rey del mambo

User avatar
Megaterio Llamas
Posts: 4008
Joined: Fri Dec 12, 2014 7:56 pm
Reputation: 2533

Postby Megaterio Llamas » Fri Aug 07, 2020 7:29 am

Rambo John J wrote:
Masato wrote::shock: :shock: :shock:


Somebody should shut off the water to LA
They don't have nearly enough water to support that population

Let it turn back into desert

Fuck that mayor and their governor...Corrupt motherfuckas

Less of that mind rot out of Hollywood would be wonderful.

And that's just for starters. There are so many benefits to this. :)
el rey del mambo

User avatar
Masato
Site Admin
Posts: 18299
Joined: Mon Jun 25, 2012 3:16 pm
Reputation: 8227

Postby Masato » Fri Aug 07, 2020 12:14 pm

Megaterio Llamas wrote:
Rambo John J wrote:
Masato wrote::shock: :shock: :shock:


Somebody should shut off the water to LA
They don't have nearly enough water to support that population

Let it turn back into desert

Fuck that mayor and their governor...Corrupt motherfuckas

Less of that mind rot out of Hollywood would be wonderful.

And that's just for starters. There are so many benefits to this. :)


I was thinking about this too lol -But I would suspect that any discernment to shutting off water and power would also become political and corrupted... I can imagine the right Hollywood parties would make sure they are protected and paid up. Reversely, they would be able to shut down power on any lower class street they want with zero repercussions.
If however any of the Q narrative is true, you are right such a power could be used for weeding as well. Haven't seen enough to make me think so but I bet there are some who are hoping lol. My wife talked to a woman yesterday who truly believed that Trump is a saviour sent by god to save the world.





HERE is an interesting article... Folks where I live have gone full-on mask conformity. EVERYONE is wearing masks. Yet every time I try to find the reasons why, I can't find anything. Even the CDC etc have their own studies that say they are meaningless to stop viruses.

Check this out:

Are Face Masks Effective? The Evidence
An overview of the current evidence regarding the effectiveness of face masks.
https://www.globalresearch.ca/are-face- ... ce/5720209

1. Studies on the effectiveness of face masks

So far, most studies found little to no evidence for the effectiveness of cloth face masks in the general population, neither as personal protective equipment nor as a source control.

A May 2020 meta-study on pandemic influenza published by the US CDC found that face masks had no effect, neither as personal protective equipment nor as a source control.
A July 2020 review by the Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medince found that there is no evidence for the effectiveness of cloth masks against virus infection or transmission.
A Covid-19 cross-country study by the University of East Anglia came to the conclusion that a mask requirement was of no benefit and could even increase the risk of infection.
An April 2020 review by two US professors in respiratory and infectious disease from the University of Illinois concluded that face masks have no effect in everyday life, neither as self-protection nor to protect third parties (so-called source control).
An article in the New England Journal of Medicine from May 2020 came to the conclusion that cloth face masks offer little to no protection in everyday life.
A July 2020 study by Japanese researchers found that cloth masks “offer zero protection against coronavirus” due to their large pore size and generally poor fit.
A 2015 study in the British Medical Journal BMJ Open found that cloth masks were penetrated by 97% of particles and may increase infection risk by retaining moisture or repeated use.
Additional aspects:

Japan, despite its widespread use of face masks, experienced its most recent influenza epidemic with more than 5 million people falling ill just one year ago, in January and February 2019. However, unlike SARS-2, the influenza virus is transmitted by children, too.

Several countries and states that introduced mandatory face masks on public transport and in shops in early summer, such as California and Argentinia, nevertheless saw a strong increase in infections from July onwards, indicating a low effectiveness of mask policies.

There is increasing evidence that SARS-2 is transmitted, at least indoors, not only by droplets but also by smaller aerosols. However, due to their large pore size, cloth masks cannot filter out aerosols.

The WHO admitted to the BBC that its June 2020 mask policy update was due not to new evidence but “political lobbying”:

There Is No Science to Support Mandatory Face Masks. A Symbol of Social Submission?
“We had been told by various sources WHO committee reviewing the evidence had not backed masks but they recommended them due to political lobbying. This point was put to WHO who did not deny.” (Deborah Cohen, BBC Medical Corresponent).

2. Studies claiming face masks are effective

Some recent studies argued that cloth face masks are indeed effective against the new coronavirus and could at least prevent the infection of other people. However, most of these studies suffer from poor methodology and sometimes show the opposite of what they claim.

Typically, these studies ignore the effect of other measures, the natural development of infection numbers, changes in test activity, or they compare countries with very different conditions.

An overview:

A German study claimed that the introduction of compulsory masks in German cities had led to a decrease in infections. But the data does not support this: in some cities there was no change, in others a decrease, in others an increase in infections (see graph below). The city of Jena was an ‘exception’ only because it simultaneously introduced the strictest quarantine rules in Germany, but the study did not mention this.
A study in the journal PNAS claimed that masks had led to a decrease in infections in three hotspots (including New York City). This did not take into account the natural decrease in infections and other measures. The study was so flawed that over 40 scientists recommended that the study be withdrawn.
A US study claimed that mandatory masks had led to a decrease in infections in 15 states. The study did not take into account that the incidence of infection was already declining in most states at that time. A comparison with other states was not made.
A Canadian study claimed that countries with mandatory masks had fewer deaths than countries without mandatory masks. But the study compared African, Latin American, Asian and Eastern European countries with very different infection rates and population structures.
A much-cited meta-study in the journal Lancet claimed that masks “could” lead to a reduction in the risk of infection, but the studies considered mainly hospitals (Sars-1), medical (not cloth) masks, and the strength of the evidence was reported as “low”.


Mandatory masks in German cities: no relevant impact. (IZA 2020)

3. Risks associated with face masks
Wearing masks for a prolonged period of time is not harmless, as the following evidence shows:

The WHO warns of various “side effects” such as difficulty breathing and skin rashes.
Tests conducted by the University Hospital of Leipzig in Germany have shown that face masks significantly reduce the resilience and performance of healthy persons.
A German psychological study with about 1000 participants found “severe psychosocial consequences” due to the introduction of mandatory face masks in Germany.
The Hamburg Environmental Institute warned against the inhalation of chlorine compounds in polyester masks as well as problems in connection with disposal.
The European rapid alert system RAPEX has already recalled 70 mask models because they did not meet EU quality standards and could lead to “serious risks”.
In China, two boys who had to wear a mask during sports classes fainted and died.
In the US, a car driver wearing an N95 (FFP2) mask fainted and crashed into a pole.


Conclusion

Cloth face masks in the general population might be effective, at least in some circumstances, but there is currently little to no evidence supporting this proposition. If the SARS-2 virus is indeed transmitted via aerosols, at least indoors, cloth masks are unlikely to be protective.


Return to “The Grand Chessboard”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 94 guests