Licence for murder?
https://thewallwillfall.org/2020/10/05/ ... virus-act/
Thoughts on coronavirus...
- Illuminat3d0ne
- Posts: 560
- Joined: Mon Jan 08, 2018 5:26 am
- Reputation: 258
What's up guys, has there been any talk about the rockafeller writeup in 2010 called lockstep
Checking it out now and it basically lays out exactly what covid has become
Checking it out now and it basically lays out exactly what covid has become
- Illuminat3d0ne
- Posts: 560
- Joined: Mon Jan 08, 2018 5:26 am
- Reputation: 258
It also seems kind of fishy to me that trump was given this med and is all of a sudden better while also knowing the ceo of the company who makes said drug and owned stock in the company previously (not currently) https://extapps2.oge.gov/201/Presiden.n ... nal278.pdf
Seems to me the right is more on the side of not being sold on the pandemic as much as the left and this may be an attempt to swing the right towards being more receptive to the vaccine when it comes since it can't be bad for you, they just let the president be taken care of by this company
Did he even have covid?
I dunno, wierd all of this came out when he didn't have the best debate and even moreso the tape of Melania coming out
Since all of this went down, those stories have all but disappeared
Seems to me the right is more on the side of not being sold on the pandemic as much as the left and this may be an attempt to swing the right towards being more receptive to the vaccine when it comes since it can't be bad for you, they just let the president be taken care of by this company
Did he even have covid?
I dunno, wierd all of this came out when he didn't have the best debate and even moreso the tape of Melania coming out
Since all of this went down, those stories have all but disappeared
America is one giant funny, sad, bizare, scary sitcom Im sure of it, it cant be real.
- Rambo John J
- Posts: 218
- Joined: Thu May 03, 2018 11:39 pm
- Reputation: 133
Illuminat3d0ne wrote:What's up guys, has there been any talk about the rockafeller writeup in 2010 called lockstep
Checking it out now and it basically lays out exactly what covid has become
Yep
I am aware of Lockstep and a few other items of it's kind.
Dead on.
- Rambo John J
- Posts: 218
- Joined: Thu May 03, 2018 11:39 pm
- Reputation: 133
Illuminat3d0ne wrote:It also seems kind of fishy to me that trump was given this med and is all of a sudden better while also knowing the ceo of the company who makes said drug and owned stock in the company previously (not currently) https://extapps2.oge.gov/201/Presiden.n ... nal278.pdf
Seems to me the right is more on the side of not being sold on the pandemic as much as the left and this may be an attempt to swing the right towards being more receptive to the vaccine when it comes since it can't be bad for you, they just let the president be taken care of by this company
Did he even have covid?
I dunno, wierd all of this came out when he didn't have the best debate and even moreso the tape of Melania coming out
Since all of this went down, those stories have all but disappeared
Your asking all the right questions IMO
News Cycle stolen
Treatments get press instead of Vaccines
Sympathy gained
Left exposed for not caring about everybody with the "virus"
Very possible he beat Biden to the Punch on getting "Covid"...Now that card has already been played.
You can get a positive test for almost anybody if you want to...scary truth.
A simple high cycle(amplification of genetic material) PCR test on nearly anybody can produce a positive result...that is the problem with it diagnosing viruses, at enough cycles it can look like anybody is "positive"...The PCR test is far far from a binary(yes/no) test...For more on PCR test, Check the video I posted yesterday with interviews with experts and the nobel peace prize winner for inventing the test himself Kary Mullins.
Not saying it is an extremely effective tactical move for sure...but that possibility surely is on the table.
Anyone 100% believing he has covid isn't paying attention to the way the world works.
https://unherd.com/2020/10/covid-expert ... other-way/
Covid experts: there is another way
Three eminent epidemiologists met in Massachusetts to plan a better response to the pandemic
From Harvard, Oxford, and Stanford
“This is the saner approach, the more scientific approach,” the authors tell Freddie Sayers
As infectious disease epidemiologists and public health scientists we have grave concerns about the damaging physical, and mental health impacts of the prevailing COVID-19 policies and recommend an approach we call Focused Protection.
Coming from both the left and right, and around the world, we have devoted our careers to protecting people. Current lockdown policies are producing devastating effects on short and long-term public health. The results (to name a few) include lower childhood vaccination rates, worsening cardiovascular disease outcomes, fewer cancer screenings and deteriorating mental health – leading to greater excess mortality in years to come, with the working class and younger members of society carrying the heaviest burden. Keeping students out of school is a grave injustice.
Keeping these measures in place until a vaccine is available will cause irreparable damage, with the underprivileged disproportionately harmed.
Fortunately, our understanding of the virus is growing. We know that vulnerability to death from COVID-19 is more than a thousand-fold higher in the old and infirm than the young. Indeed, for children, COVID-19 is less dangerous than many other harms, including influenza.
As immunity builds in the population, the risk of infection to all – including the vulnerable – falls. We know that all populations will eventually reach herd immunity – i.e. the point at which the rate of new infections is stable – and that this can be assisted by (but is not dependent upon) a vaccine. Our goal should therefore be to minimize mortality and social harm until we reach herd immunity.
The most compassionate approach that balances the risks and benefits of reaching herd immunity, is to allow those who are at minimal risk of death to live their lives normally to build up immunity to the virus through natural infection, while better protecting those who are at highest risk. We call this Focused Protection.
Adopting measures to protect the vulnerable should be the central aim of public health responses to COVID-19. By way of example, nursing homes should use staff with acquired immunity and perform frequent PCR testing of other staff and all visitors. Staff rotation should be minimized. Retired people living at home should have groceries and other essentials delivered to their home. When possible, they should meet family members outside rather than inside. A comprehensive and detailed list of measures, including approaches to multi-generational households, can be implemented, and is well within the scope and capability of public health professionals.
Those who are not vulnerable should immediately be allowed to resume life as normal. Simple hygiene measures, such as hand washing and staying home when sick should be practiced by everyone to reduce the herd immunity threshold. Schools and universities should be open for in-person teaching. Extracurricular activities, such as sports, should be resumed. Young low-risk adults should work normally, rather than from home. Restaurants and other businesses should open. Arts, music, sport and other cultural activities should resume. People who are more at risk may participate if they wish, while society as a whole enjoys the protection conferred upon the vulnerable by those who have built up herd immunity.
Great Barrington, Massachusetts, 4th October 2020
To sign the declaration, follow this link (will be live later today):
http://www.GBdeclaration.org
Covid experts: there is another way
Three eminent epidemiologists met in Massachusetts to plan a better response to the pandemic
From Harvard, Oxford, and Stanford
“This is the saner approach, the more scientific approach,” the authors tell Freddie Sayers
As infectious disease epidemiologists and public health scientists we have grave concerns about the damaging physical, and mental health impacts of the prevailing COVID-19 policies and recommend an approach we call Focused Protection.
Coming from both the left and right, and around the world, we have devoted our careers to protecting people. Current lockdown policies are producing devastating effects on short and long-term public health. The results (to name a few) include lower childhood vaccination rates, worsening cardiovascular disease outcomes, fewer cancer screenings and deteriorating mental health – leading to greater excess mortality in years to come, with the working class and younger members of society carrying the heaviest burden. Keeping students out of school is a grave injustice.
Keeping these measures in place until a vaccine is available will cause irreparable damage, with the underprivileged disproportionately harmed.
Fortunately, our understanding of the virus is growing. We know that vulnerability to death from COVID-19 is more than a thousand-fold higher in the old and infirm than the young. Indeed, for children, COVID-19 is less dangerous than many other harms, including influenza.
As immunity builds in the population, the risk of infection to all – including the vulnerable – falls. We know that all populations will eventually reach herd immunity – i.e. the point at which the rate of new infections is stable – and that this can be assisted by (but is not dependent upon) a vaccine. Our goal should therefore be to minimize mortality and social harm until we reach herd immunity.
The most compassionate approach that balances the risks and benefits of reaching herd immunity, is to allow those who are at minimal risk of death to live their lives normally to build up immunity to the virus through natural infection, while better protecting those who are at highest risk. We call this Focused Protection.
Adopting measures to protect the vulnerable should be the central aim of public health responses to COVID-19. By way of example, nursing homes should use staff with acquired immunity and perform frequent PCR testing of other staff and all visitors. Staff rotation should be minimized. Retired people living at home should have groceries and other essentials delivered to their home. When possible, they should meet family members outside rather than inside. A comprehensive and detailed list of measures, including approaches to multi-generational households, can be implemented, and is well within the scope and capability of public health professionals.
Those who are not vulnerable should immediately be allowed to resume life as normal. Simple hygiene measures, such as hand washing and staying home when sick should be practiced by everyone to reduce the herd immunity threshold. Schools and universities should be open for in-person teaching. Extracurricular activities, such as sports, should be resumed. Young low-risk adults should work normally, rather than from home. Restaurants and other businesses should open. Arts, music, sport and other cultural activities should resume. People who are more at risk may participate if they wish, while society as a whole enjoys the protection conferred upon the vulnerable by those who have built up herd immunity.
Great Barrington, Massachusetts, 4th October 2020
To sign the declaration, follow this link (will be live later today):
http://www.GBdeclaration.org
Illuminat3d0ne wrote:What's up guys, has there been any talk about the rockafeller writeup in 2010 called lockstep
Checking it out now and it basically lays out exactly what covid has become
Its in the thread somewhere. Ill find the page.
Masato wrote:Document from the ROCKEFELLER FOUNDATION in 2010
SCENARIO for the FUTURE of TECHNOLOGY and INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT
Predicts a DESIRABLE scenario that eerily matches what we are seeing.
If you don't understand the history of the Rockefellers, you seriously need to do your homework. These guys have been cultivating evil for over 100 years, at the crux of the Oil Industry, Central Banking, both World Wars, the entire western medical/pharma industry, the United Nations, World Health Organization, control of media, and overall putting nearly ALL the pieces in place for an openly admitted agenda for World Government.
This is a FACT, no opinion nor speculation. Mountains of clear evidence for this, its just avoided in the press (wonder why) so, brutally, most people are unaware of the realities of what that name means
link to full document:
https://archive.org/details/pdfy-tNG7Mj ... b/mode/2up
One scenarios in the document is 'LOCK STEP':
Its weird because its written in past tense, as though it were from the future or something lol
As a result there are numerous 'predictions' made... mor example if Nigeria overthrows their government in 2026 I will not be surprised, lol:
Notice the use of the term 'Climate Change' in 2010:
Page 34
this place has become 333.com
Ill fix this shit
Ill fix this shit
Return to “The Grand Chessboard”
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 89 guests