Vutulaki wrote: Masato wrote:
Som-Pong wrote:It’s odd how the bourgeois never seem to learn.
how would you define 'liberal' ?
In Canada our political parties are literally 'Liberals' and 'Conservatives', so whatever those words might have once meant is now psychologically wrapped up in whatever these parties do. I guess its the same with Reps and Dems.
splain again please.
The words 'liberal, conservative, democrat, republican' are all very specific political terms, yet not accurately represented by the parties of the same names. So the words have their meanings scrambled up, we can't use them in a discussion anymore because the parties are confused with the concepts
When Som says he's a 'liberal', does that mean he's all on Justin Trudeau's nuts? for example. In Canada that's what people would think you mean